Nnamdi Kanu news today

The Court of Appeal Abuja has reserved judgement in the case between the leader of the Indigenous People's of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu and the federal.

The panel asked. Kaswe, admitted in the affirmative. Kaswe, Assistant Chief State Counsel from the Chambers of the Attorney-General of the Federation, told the Court to dismiss the appeal for lacking in merit. Ozekhome argued that the remaining counts of the charge ought not to have been retained by the lower court because at the time Kanu was renditioned back to Kenya, he was already facing a five-count charge in line with the Extradition Act. “In September 2017, agents of the federal government invaded his ancestral home and he escaped to Israel and then to the United Kingdom. The Court of Appeal Abuja has reserved judgement in the case between the leader of the Indigenous People’s of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu and the federal government.

The appeal by leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu challenging a seven-count amended charge filed against him by the |

[Investigations3 months ago](https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/feature-ogun-residents-waste-collectors-trade-blames-as-refuse-litter-environment/) [Investigations2 months ago](https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/investigation-untold-story-of-ondo-oil-producing-communities-battling-poor-health-system/) [Investigations1 month ago](https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/investigation-how-roadside-foods-endanger-consumers-life-with-trans-fat-in-northern-nigeria/) [Investigations2 weeks ago](https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/special-report-hike-in-gas-price-forces-more-nigerians-to-use-coal-sawdust-as-smoke-kills-93300-yearly/) [Investigations3 days ago](https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/investigation-how-kano-subeb-awarded-contracts-to-inactive-contractors-non-existent-schools-in-kano/) [Politics](https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/politics/)

The Court of Appeal Abuja has reserved judgment on an appeal filed by the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, seeking to quash the ...

Insisting that the charge FG entered against him had no basis in law, he is also urging the appellate court to order his release on bail, pending the determination of his appeal. The IPOB leader, who is currently facing trial before the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, had approached the court of appeal to query the legal competence of the charge pending against him. The Court of Appeal Abuja has reserved judgment on an appeal filed by the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, seeking to quash the terrorism and treasonable felony charge the Federal Government preferred against him.

The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory, has reserved judgment on the case against the detained leader of the proscribed ...

“My lords, he was enjoying this bail without breaching the terms. Meanwhile, the FG, through its lawyer, Mr. He also insisted that the charge FG entered against him had no basis in law.

The Leader of the Indigenous People of BIAFRA (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu's Lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor has said that their legal team was prepared for today legal.

“It was a reassuring visit where details of tomorrow’s (Tuesday) strategic legal fireworks was distilled by the erudite Silk. The statement partly read, “Today’s (Monday) visit was eminently led by the legal Iroko of our time, the indefatigable Lead Counsel to Onyendu-Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN. The Leader of the Indigenous People of BIAFRA (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu’s Lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor has said that their legal team was prepared for today legal battle.

The Court of Appeal panel reserved its decision after it listened the legal teams of the federal government and the IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu.

The offence is said to be punishable under section 1(2)(b) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2015. Good journalism costs a lot of money. The offence was said to be punishable under section 1 (2) (h) of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013. The prosecution says the alleged offence is punishable under section 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism (Prevention) Act 2013. Mr Kanu allegedly ordered whoever flouted the order should “write his/her will”, and as a result banks, schools, markets, shopping malls, and fuel stations domiciled in the eastern states of Nigeria must not open for business. This alleged offence, the prosecution says, is punishable under section 1 (2) (h) of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013. The offence is said to be punishable under section 1 (2) (h) of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013. Cap, C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004. It said a date for judgement would be communicated to the parties. The offence is said to be punishable under 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2013. Mr Kanu, also on diverse dates between 2018 and 2021, allegedly broadcasted furtherance of an act of terrorism against Nigeria and its people, received and heard in Nigeria in furtherance of an act of terrorism, inciting members of the public in Nigeria a to hunt and kill families of Nigeria security personnel.The offence is said to be punishable under 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2013. The prosecution said the offence is punishable under section 1(2)(b) of the Terrorism (Prevention) Amendment Act (2013).